<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Akismet Broken Or Blog Spam Way Up?</title>
	<link>http://www.shandyking.com/2007/06/11/is-akismet-broken-or-blog-spam-way-up/</link>
	<description>Obsessive Compulsive Entrepreneur</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.shandyking.com/2007/06/11/is-akismet-broken-or-blog-spam-way-up/#comment-33640</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shandyking.com/2007/06/11/is-akismet-broken-or-blog-spam-way-up/#comment-33640</guid>
		<description>My blog is 1 month old and its getting 10-20 spam comments daily, and some spam comments do manage to pass the Akismet filters. I thinking to use any other method to prevent spam.
Also, yesterday, a real comment went into the Akismet spam list and I had to revive it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My blog is 1 month old and its getting 10-20 spam comments daily, and some spam comments do manage to pass the Akismet filters. I thinking to use any other method to prevent spam.<br />
Also, yesterday, a real comment went into the Akismet spam list and I had to revive it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shandyking</title>
		<link>http://www.shandyking.com/2007/06/11/is-akismet-broken-or-blog-spam-way-up/#comment-33109</link>
		<dc:creator>shandyking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shandyking.com/2007/06/11/is-akismet-broken-or-blog-spam-way-up/#comment-33109</guid>
		<description>Brian,

Thats an interesting theory!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>Thats an interesting theory!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.shandyking.com/2007/06/11/is-akismet-broken-or-blog-spam-way-up/#comment-33108</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shandyking.com/2007/06/11/is-akismet-broken-or-blog-spam-way-up/#comment-33108</guid>
		<description>I've been seeing a general decrease in Akismet's performance. I am willing to guess that there is a whole system of black hats out there with Akismet-empowered blogs who are now approving spam in order to render Akismet's auto-detection ineffective.

My $0.02.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been seeing a general decrease in Akismet&#8217;s performance. I am willing to guess that there is a whole system of black hats out there with Akismet-empowered blogs who are now approving spam in order to render Akismet&#8217;s auto-detection ineffective.</p>
<p>My $0.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shandyking</title>
		<link>http://www.shandyking.com/2007/06/11/is-akismet-broken-or-blog-spam-way-up/#comment-33000</link>
		<dc:creator>shandyking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shandyking.com/2007/06/11/is-akismet-broken-or-blog-spam-way-up/#comment-33000</guid>
		<description>Yea, their IP's are rotating but I keep seeing the same IP addresses even though I mark them as spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, their IP&#8217;s are rotating but I keep seeing the same IP addresses even though I mark them as spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NevDull</title>
		<link>http://www.shandyking.com/2007/06/11/is-akismet-broken-or-blog-spam-way-up/#comment-32962</link>
		<dc:creator>NevDull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shandyking.com/2007/06/11/is-akismet-broken-or-blog-spam-way-up/#comment-32962</guid>
		<description>I've noticed quite the increase, as well.  All with links to .info domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed quite the increase, as well.  All with links to .info domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
